Deciding between Test Management Tools is difficult when there are many excellent free tools, and paid TestRail Alternatives test management tools are on the market. The three we will be comparing today are Testrail vs Hiptest (CucumberStudio), along with AccelaTest. Although each test case management tool has excellent options, deciding the right software tool for your QA and development teams is a matter of cost, your software development process, and the features that your team requires.
Summary of Comparison
Before getting into the details of each of the test case management tools, we will analyze the core features of the test management tools and how they will help your software testing efforts.
What is each of the tools going to cost?
Both TestRail and CucumberStudio require a monthly subscription to use the test case management tool. In contrast, the comprehensive test case management features in AccelaTest are, and always will be, completely free for teams.
The pricing for test case management is as follows:
- Testrail: $34 per user per month
- CucumberStudio: $30.50 per user per month
- AccelaTest: $0.00 per user per month
Additionally, both of these solutions do offer a free trial. In the pricing arena, AccelaTest is the clear winner for being the only no-cost solution that supports your entire testing process.
How do the tools rank as a Test Case Management Solution?
Test Case Management tools should allow you to create test cases, test suites, test plans and support the software development process. Fortunately, all three contenders deliver on their ability to manage test cases and include the ability to reuse test cases.
The most notable differences between the tools are a lack of Behavior Driven Development support for TestRail and the inability to add attachments to test cases in CucumberStudio. AccelaTest is still in active development and working towards adding more features, which is documented below.
As the core features offered by all the tools in this arena are roughly the same, and all teams may not need the missing features, we declare a tie.
How do the tools rank on the ability to Manage Test Runs?
The ability to run your test cases and report the results out is of equal importance. Fortunately, once again, all three contenders deliver on this both the ability to manage test runs and report results.
The most notable differences between the tools are a lack of Behavior Driven Development support for TestRail and the inability to add attachments to test cases in CucumberStudio. AccelaTest is still in active development and working towards adding more features, which is documented below.
Once all of the enhancements are complete, AccelaTest will be the clear winner in this category.
How well do the tools handle Defect Management?
None of the tools offer standalone defect management, but they do provide 3rd party integrations for issues. Also, there is a lack of ability to report issues directly from all of the tools. Due to the same functionality offered by all of the solutions, we declare Defect Management a tie.
What are the 39 TestRail vs HipTest (CucumberStudio) Comparison Points?
In this comparison of CucumberStudio (formerly HipTest), TestRail, and AccelaTest, we will be comparing these tool’s key features: Requirement Management, Test Cases, Execution of Test Cycles, Bugs or Defects, Integration Capabilities, Certifications, Support, Reporting, and finally finish up with Pricing.
There are pros and cons to every software testing tool, so let’s get to it.
 |
 |
 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirement Management |
||||||
| Hierarchical requirements support | ||||||
| Requirement and Defect Linking | ||||||
Test Case Management |
||||||
| Add attachments to test steps | ||||||
| Duplicate tests between projects | ||||||
| Create, view, edit, clone tests within project | ||||||
| Reusable test repositories | ||||||
| Session-based exploratory testing | ||||||
| Gherkin/Cucumber (BDD) support | ||||||
| Summary / Pre-Conditions | ||||||
Test Sets and Execution Management |
||||||
| Test execution and results audit history | ||||||
| Modify tests during test execution | 1 | |||||
| Report defects from test runner | 1 | |||||
| Assign tests to testers | ||||||
| Test Case Parameterization | ||||||
| Ability to Clone, Edit, and Delete Test Runs | ||||||
| Associate test repository to any test execution set | ||||||
| Set test result (pass/fail) status in one click. | ||||||
Bug Management |
||||||
| Standalone issue management module | ||||||
| 3rd party issue tracking integrations | ||||||
| Ability to report issues directly (email, Slack, Teams) | ||||||
Integrations |
||||||
| Integration with Test Automation Tools | ||||||
| Jira Issues | ||||||
| Zapier | ||||||
| API | ||||||
| Slack integration | ||||||
| Webhooks | ||||||
Customization |
||||||
| Filter information hierarchically (examples: Test names, Test tree, Bug details) | ||||||
| Custom workflows | ||||||
| Custom tags or fields | ||||||
| Permission-Based Privileges | ||||||
Reporting |
||||||
| Customizable graphs, dashboards, and metrics | ||||||
| Scheduled report delivery | ||||||
Additional Features |
||||||
| Import & Export all data | ||||||
| Search (ability to add criteria) | ||||||
| Installation on-premises or Cloud | Cloud | Both | Both | |||
| Task Board | ||||||
Security and Certifications |
||||||
| Soc 2 | ||||||
| ISO 27001 | ||||||
Service and Support |
||||||
| Support | ||||||
Pricing |
||||||
| Price |
|
$34 / user / mo Start Monthly Subscription |
$30.50 / user / mo Start Monthly Subscription |
|||
Legend:
1: Functionality is on roadmap to be implemented.
2: Email support to activate for your project.
Test Case Management Tool Comparison – FAQ
What is AccelaTest?
Accelatest Test Runner Overview
Test Case Creation in AccelaTest
AccelaTest is different from many popular tools. We have made all core functionality our competitors charge money for entirely free for your team. You read that right. We offer the ability to efficiently manage test plans, test runs, test results, and reporting at no cost.
What is HipTest (CucumberStudio)?
CucumberStudio started as an open-source project that SmartBear purchased. HipTest is a continuous testing platform designed for agile DevOps teams. This tool heavily focuses on BDD test cases. Test cases are created with the action words in the Gherkin syntax.
Many agile teams use CucumberStudio to boost productivity and ensure the highest quality software is delivered. QA teams have found great success using this solution.
Cucumber Studio Test Execution
Test Case Creation in CucumberStudio
What is TestRail?
TestRail is owned by GuRock and is another comprehensive test case management tool built to monitor software testing progress and track progress. TestRail also integrates with many third-party tools available on the market like the Jira plugin, Redmine, Rally, and many others.
Your QA department could join the many others who have found much success with TestRail.
TestRail vs HipTest (CucumberStudio) Conclusion
Hopefully, you now have a better understanding of HipTest (CucumberStudio) vs TestRail, in addition to our Free Test Management tool. Many tools have similar features and will continue adding new features to boost productivity. This makes the cost of test management tools a significant difference. The test case management features of AccelaTest are forever free for teams. Open your free account now or discover all the features offered here.
Resources:
- TestRail: https://www.gurock.com/testrail/tour/modern-test-management
- CucumberStudio (formerly HipTest): https://cucumber.io/tools/cucumberstudio/pricing/