Deciding between Test Management Tools is difficult when there are many excellent free tools and paid test management tools are on the market. The three we will be comparing today are Zephyr vs. Xray, along with our free AccelaTest. Although each test case management tool has excellent options, deciding the right software tool for your QA team and development teams is a matter of cost, your software development process, and the features your team requires.
Summary of Feature Level Comparison
Before getting into the details of each of the test case management tools, we will analyze all the features of the test management tools and how they will help your software testing efforts.
What is each of the tools going to cost?
Xray vs. Zephyr both require a monthly subscription to use the test case management tool. In contrast, the comprehensive test case management features in AccelaTest are, and always will be, completely free.
The pricing for each test case management tool is as follows:
Zephyr pricing starts at $10 per user per month
Xray pricing starts at $10 / year
AccelaTest’s price starts at $0.00 per user per month.
Additionally, both of these solutions do offer a free trial. In the pricing arena, AccelaTest is the clear winner for being the only no-cost solution that supports your entire testing process.
How do the tools rank as a Test Case Management Solution?
Test Case Management tools should allow you to perform test case writing, test plans and support the software development process. Fortunately, all three contenders deliver on their ability to manage test cases and include the ability to reuse test cases.
The most notable differences between the tools are a lack of Session-based exploratory testing for Zephyr and AccelaTest and the inability to reuse test repositories for Xray.
As the core features offered by all the tools in this arena are roughly the same, and all teams may not need the different features, we declare a tie.
How do the tools rank on the ability to Manage Test Runs?
The ability to create a test plans report, and a test runs report is vital for many teams. Fortunately, once again, all three contenders deliver on this both the ability to manage test executions and reports. Examples of these reports include:
test case execution report
test execution burndown chart
overall requirement coverage report
historical requirement coverage report
top defects impacting testing report
The most notable difference between the tools is the inability to quickly set test results in Zephyr and Xray.
Only Zephyr offers a standalone defect management component. However, Xray and AccelaTest offer integration with other tools for issues, such as Jira Issues through Jira plug-ins. Due to the same functionality offered by all of the solutions, we declare Defect Management a tie.
What are the 39 Xray vs. Zephyr Feature Level Comparison Points?
In this feature level comparison of Zephyr and Xray, we will be comparing these tool’s key features: Requirement Management, Test Cases, Execution of Test Cycles, Bugs or Defects, Integration Capabilities, Certifications, Support, Reporting, and finally finish up with Pricing.
There are pros and cons to every testing tool, so let’s get to it.
Requirement Management
Hierarchical requirements support
Requirement and Defect Linking
Test case management
Add attachments to test steps
Duplicate tests between projects
Create, view, edit, clone tests within project
Reusable test repositories
Session-based exploratory testing
Gherkin/Cucumber (BDD) support
Summary / Pre-Conditions
Test Sets and Execution Management
Test execution and results audit history
Modify tests during test execution
1
Report defects from test runner
1
Assign tests to testers
Test Case Parameterization
Ability to Clone, Edit, and Delete Test Runs
Associate test repository to any test execution set
Set test result (pass/fail) status in one click.
Bug management
Standalone issue management module
3rd party issue tracking integrations
Ability to report issues directly (email, Slack, Teams)
Integrations
Integration with Test Automation Tools
Jira Issues
Zapier
API
Slack integration
Webhooks
Customization
Filter information hierarchically (examples: Test names, Test tree, Bug details)
Legend: 1: Functionality is on roadmap to be implemented. 2: Email support to activate for your project.
Test Case Management Tool Comparison – FAQ
What is AccelaTest?
Accelatest Test Runner Overview
Test Case Creation in AccelaTest
AccelaTest is different from many popular tools. We have made all core functionality our competitors charge money for entirely free for small teams. You read that right. We offer the ability to efficiently manage test plans, test case writing, test executions, test results, and reporting (test plans report, test runs report, test case execution report, etc.) at no cost.
Xray is another comprehensive test case management application built to monitor testing progress and track progress. Xray was built with integration with Jira in mind. It can integrate with Jira Issue types through a Jira add-on.
Xray offers many impressive reports that allow teams to know the exact status of their project:
Test Plans Report
Traceability Report
Overall Requirement Coverage Report
Historical Requirement Coverage Report
Test Executions Report
Test Runs Report
Many agile teams use Xray to boost productivity and ensure the highest quality software is delivered. Users have found great success using this solution.
What is Zephyr?
Zephyr is owned by Smartbear and has been built to heavily integrate with Jira through the use of Jira plug-ins. In addition to Jira, Zephyr also integrates through many other third-party plugins available on the market like Bamboo, Jenkins, and many others.
Similar to Xray, Zephyr offers many quality reports:
Traceability Report
Test Execution Burndown Chart
Test Executions Report
Top Defects Impacting Testing
Your QA team could join the many other happy users who have found much success with Zephyr.
Zephyr vs. Xray Conclusion
Hopefully, you now have a better understanding of Xray vs. Zephyr, in addition to our Free Test Management tool. As you have seen, Zephyr and Xray have similar features, and AccelaTest will continue adding new features. This makes the cost of test management tools a significant difference. The test case management features of AccelaTest are free while Zephyr and Xray will continue to cost you monthly. Open your free account now or discover all the features offered here.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.